Information on Result #563597
There is no linear OOA(922, 17, F9, 2, 21) (dual of [(17, 2), 12, 22]-NRT-code), because 11 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(911, 17, F9, 10) (dual of [17, 6, 11]-code), but
- “MPa†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(922, 17, F9, 3, 21) (dual of [(17, 3), 29, 22]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |