Information on Result #568290
There is no linear OOA(2258, 236, F2, 3, 146) (dual of [(236, 3), 450, 147]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2258, 236, F2, 2, 146) (dual of [(236, 2), 214, 147]-NRT-code), but
- 34 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2224, 236, F2, 112) (dual of [236, 12, 113]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2112, 123, F2, 56) (dual of [123, 11, 57]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(256, 66, F2, 28) (dual of [66, 10, 29]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(257, 67, F2, 29) (dual of [67, 10, 30]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(256, 66, F2, 28) (dual of [66, 10, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2112, 123, F2, 56) (dual of [123, 11, 57]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.