Information on Result #569342
There is no linear OOA(3120, 105, F3, 3, 88) (dual of [(105, 3), 195, 89]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3120, 105, F3, 2, 88) (dual of [(105, 2), 90, 89]-NRT-code), but
- 22 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(398, 105, F3, 66) (dual of [105, 7, 67]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(332, 38, F3, 22) (dual of [38, 6, 23]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(331, 37, F3, 21) (dual of [37, 6, 22]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(331, 37, F3, 21) (dual of [37, 6, 22]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(332, 38, F3, 22) (dual of [38, 6, 23]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.