Information on Result #572520
There is no linear OOA(46, 12, F4, 3, 5) (dual of [(12, 3), 30, 6]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(46, 12, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(12, 2), 18, 6]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(45, 12, F4, 4) (dual of [12, 7, 5]-code), but
- dual of a near-MDS code is again a near-MDS code [i] would yield linear OA(47, 12, F4, 6) (dual of [12, 5, 7]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(47, 10, F4, 6) (dual of [10, 3, 7]-code), but
- dual of a near-MDS code is again a near-MDS code [i] would yield linear OA(47, 12, F4, 6) (dual of [12, 5, 7]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.