Information on Result #573431
There is no linear OOA(4148, 260, F4, 3, 107) (dual of [(260, 3), 632, 108]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4148, 260, F4, 2, 107) (dual of [(260, 2), 372, 108]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4145, 260, F4, 104) (dual of [260, 115, 105]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(441, 155, S4, 26), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 552818 318951 874532 269123 698121 730294 556917 760000 / 109558 651860 901659 660161 > 441 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(441, 155, S4, 26), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.