Information on Result #574864
There is no linear OOA(4229, 257, F4, 3, 171) (dual of [(257, 3), 542, 172]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(4229, 257, F4, 2, 171) (dual of [(257, 2), 285, 172]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(4226, 257, F4, 168) (dual of [257, 31, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(458, 88, S4, 42), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 158 237175 107336 529531 271038 987459 138072 539269 830656 314178 535424 / 1500 577564 280935 407980 323611 > 458 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(458, 88, S4, 42), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.