Information on Result #577452
There is no linear OOA(8160, 238, F8, 3, 139) (dual of [(238, 3), 554, 140]-NRT-code), because 1 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(8160, 238, F8, 2, 139) (dual of [(238, 2), 316, 140]-NRT-code), but
- 3 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(8157, 238, F8, 136) (dual of [238, 81, 137]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(821, 101, S8, 17), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(820, 100, S8, 16), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 766 916854 670851 025894 998613 688320 / 621 810617 698353 > 820 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(820, 100, S8, 16), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(821, 101, S8, 17), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.