Information on Result #578214
There is no linear OOA(8147, 50, F8, 3, 142) (dual of [(50, 3), 3, 143]-NRT-code), because 100 step m-reduction would yield linear OA(847, 50, F8, 42) (dual of [50, 3, 43]-code), but
- “Hi4†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(8148, 51, F8, 3, 143) (dual of [(51, 3), 5, 144]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(8149, 51, F8, 3, 144) (dual of [(51, 3), 4, 145]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(8150, 51, F8, 3, 145) (dual of [(51, 3), 3, 146]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||