Information on Result #579355
There is no linear OOA(2147, 165, F2, 4, 73) (dual of [(165, 4), 513, 74]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2147, 165, F2, 2, 73) (dual of [(165, 2), 183, 74]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2146, 165, F2, 72) (dual of [165, 19, 73]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(274, 92, F2, 36) (dual of [92, 18, 37]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(275, 93, F2, 37) (dual of [93, 18, 38]-code), but
- “Bro†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(275, 93, F2, 37) (dual of [93, 18, 38]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(274, 92, F2, 36) (dual of [92, 18, 37]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.