Information on Result #579532
There is no linear OOA(2158, 150, F2, 4, 88) (dual of [(150, 4), 442, 89]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2158, 150, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(150, 2), 142, 89]-NRT-code), but
- 16 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2142, 150, F2, 72) (dual of [150, 8, 73]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(270, 77, F2, 36) (dual of [77, 7, 37]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(234, 40, F2, 18) (dual of [40, 6, 19]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(270, 77, F2, 36) (dual of [77, 7, 37]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.