Information on Result #581509
There is no linear OOA(389, 71, F3, 4, 68) (dual of [(71, 4), 195, 69]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(389, 71, F3, 2, 68) (dual of [(71, 2), 53, 69]-NRT-code), but
- 23 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(366, 71, F3, 45) (dual of [71, 5, 46]-code), but
- “HW1†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.