Information on Result #582649
There is no linear OOA(3166, 117, F3, 4, 130) (dual of [(117, 4), 302, 131]-NRT-code), because 2 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3166, 117, F3, 2, 130) (dual of [(117, 2), 68, 131]-NRT-code), but
- 58 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(3108, 117, F3, 72) (dual of [117, 9, 73]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(3107, 113, F3, 72) (dual of [113, 6, 73]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(335, 40, F3, 24) (dual of [40, 5, 25]-code), but
- “vE1†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(335, 40, F3, 24) (dual of [40, 5, 25]-code), but
- OA(39, 117, S3, 4), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(39, 100, S3, 4), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 20001 > 39 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(39, 100, S3, 4), but
- linear OA(3107, 113, F3, 72) (dual of [113, 6, 73]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.