Information on Result #587333
There is no linear OOA(2253, 236, F2, 5, 141) (dual of [(236, 5), 927, 142]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2253, 236, F2, 2, 141) (dual of [(236, 2), 219, 142]-NRT-code), but
- 29 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2224, 236, F2, 112) (dual of [236, 12, 113]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2112, 123, F2, 56) (dual of [123, 11, 57]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(256, 66, F2, 28) (dual of [66, 10, 29]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(257, 67, F2, 29) (dual of [67, 10, 30]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(256, 66, F2, 28) (dual of [66, 10, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2112, 123, F2, 56) (dual of [123, 11, 57]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.