Information on Result #588300
There is no linear OOA(3109, 99, F3, 5, 79) (dual of [(99, 5), 386, 80]-NRT-code), because 3 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(3109, 99, F3, 2, 79) (dual of [(99, 2), 89, 80]-NRT-code), but
- 16 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(393, 99, F3, 63) (dual of [99, 6, 64]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(38, 12, F3, 6) (dual of [12, 4, 7]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(39, 13, F3, 7) (dual of [13, 4, 8]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(330, 35, F3, 21) (dual of [35, 5, 22]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.