Information on Result #58942

There is no OA(369, 128, S3, 42), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 608 001198 593304 106218 907830 686907 775076 916565 165378 554092 710276 609555 357826 501088 330911 962882 720034 814817 891444 682681 838596 665067 963409 592743 684436 157686 057509 559170 713241 809051 496946 469627 269569 367596 452422 964732 120362 943819 537136 492537 / 700063 514007 690288 493623 500405 031069 826547 171422 379027 234454 614217 062891 744996 343198 204037 257328 431813 156380 977077 721464 526397 768944 327663 331813 298588 235435 706684 439261 947914 591660 379569 272018 701709 945865 > 369

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(369, 128, S3, 2, 42) [i]Depth Reduction
2No OOA(369, 128, S3, 3, 42) [i]
3No OOA(369, 128, S3, 4, 42) [i]
4No OOA(369, 128, S3, 5, 42) [i]
5No (27, 69, 128)-net in base 3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(3195, 255, F3, 126) (dual of [255, 60, 127]-code) [i]Residual Code