Information on Result #592645
There is no linear OOA(2160, 166, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(166, 6), 836, 83]-NRT-code), because 4 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2160, 166, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(166, 2), 172, 83]-NRT-code), but
- 2 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2158, 166, F2, 80) (dual of [166, 8, 81]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(278, 85, F2, 40) (dual of [85, 7, 41]-code), but
- “Hel†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(278, 85, F2, 40) (dual of [85, 7, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.