Information on Result #598425
There is no linear OOA(2256, 265, F2, 8, 129) (dual of [(265, 8), 1864, 130]-NRT-code), because 6 times depth reduction would yield linear OOA(2256, 265, F2, 2, 129) (dual of [(265, 2), 274, 130]-NRT-code), but
- 1 step m-reduction [i] would yield linear OA(2255, 265, F2, 128) (dual of [265, 10, 129]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2127, 136, F2, 64) (dual of [136, 9, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(263, 71, F2, 32) (dual of [71, 8, 33]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(231, 38, F2, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(215, 21, F2, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(215, 21, F2, 8) (dual of [21, 6, 9]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(231, 38, F2, 16) (dual of [38, 7, 17]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(263, 71, F2, 32) (dual of [71, 8, 33]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2127, 136, F2, 64) (dual of [136, 9, 65]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.