Information on Result #598626
There is no digital (51, 103, 112)-net over F2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield linear OA(2103, 112, F2, 52) (dual of [112, 9, 53]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(251, 59, F2, 26) (dual of [59, 8, 27]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(252, 60, F2, 27) (dual of [60, 8, 28]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(252, 60, F2, 27) (dual of [60, 8, 28]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No digital (51, 104, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No digital (51, 105, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
3 | No digital (51, 106, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
4 | No digital (51, 107, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
5 | No digital (51, 108, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
6 | No digital (51, 109, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
7 | No digital (51, 110, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
8 | No digital (51, 111, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
9 | No digital (51, 112, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
10 | No digital (51, 113, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
11 | No digital (51, 114, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
12 | No digital (51, 115, 112)-net over F2 | [i] | ||
13 | No digital (51, 116, 112)-net over F2 | [i] |