Information on Result #610004
Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 43) (dual of [66, 2, 44]-code), using repeating each code word 22 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 42) (dual of [66, 2, 43]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 41) (dual of [66, 2, 42]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 40) (dual of [66, 2, 41]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 39) (dual of [66, 2, 40]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(264, 66, F2, 38) (dual of [66, 2, 39]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OA(263, 65, F2, 42) (dual of [65, 2, 43]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 7 | Linear OA(262, 64, F2, 41) (dual of [64, 2, 42]-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | Linear OA(260, 62, F2, 39) (dual of [62, 2, 40]-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | Linear OA(259, 61, F2, 38) (dual of [61, 2, 39]-code) | [i] | ||
| 10 | Linear OA(257, 59, F2, 36) (dual of [59, 2, 37]-code) | [i] | ||
| 11 | Linear OA(256, 58, F2, 35) (dual of [58, 2, 36]-code) | [i] | ||
| 12 | Linear OA(254, 56, F2, 33) (dual of [56, 2, 34]-code) | [i] | ||
| 13 | Linear OA(253, 55, F2, 32) (dual of [55, 2, 33]-code) | [i] | ||
| 14 | Linear OA(251, 53, F2, 30) (dual of [53, 2, 31]-code) | [i] | ||
| 15 | Linear OOA(264, 33, F2, 2, 43) (dual of [(33, 2), 2, 44]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 16 | Linear OOA(264, 22, F2, 3, 43) (dual of [(22, 3), 2, 44]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||