Information on Result #610006
Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 39) (dual of [60, 2, 40]-code), using repeating each code word 20 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 38) (dual of [60, 2, 39]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 37) (dual of [60, 2, 38]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 36) (dual of [60, 2, 37]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 35) (dual of [60, 2, 36]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(258, 60, F2, 34) (dual of [60, 2, 35]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OA(257, 59, F2, 38) (dual of [59, 2, 39]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
7 | Linear OA(256, 58, F2, 37) (dual of [58, 2, 38]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(254, 56, F2, 35) (dual of [56, 2, 36]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OA(253, 55, F2, 34) (dual of [55, 2, 35]-code) | [i] | ||
10 | Linear OA(251, 53, F2, 32) (dual of [53, 2, 33]-code) | [i] | ||
11 | Linear OA(250, 52, F2, 31) (dual of [52, 2, 32]-code) | [i] | ||
12 | Linear OA(248, 50, F2, 29) (dual of [50, 2, 30]-code) | [i] | ||
13 | Linear OA(247, 49, F2, 28) (dual of [49, 2, 29]-code) | [i] | ||
14 | Linear OOA(258, 30, F2, 2, 39) (dual of [(30, 2), 2, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
15 | Linear OOA(258, 20, F2, 3, 39) (dual of [(20, 3), 2, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
16 | Linear OOA(258, 12, F2, 5, 39) (dual of [(12, 5), 2, 40]-NRT-code) | [i] |