Information on Result #632691
Linear OA(3163, 184, F3, 84) (dual of [184, 21, 85]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2716, 23, F27, 16) (dual of [23, 7, 17]-code or 23-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(3163, 184, F3, 83) (dual of [184, 21, 84]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(3163, 184, F3, 82) (dual of [184, 21, 83]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(3163, 92, F3, 2, 84) (dual of [(92, 2), 21, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |