Information on Result #635439
Linear OA(4126, 216, F4, 49) (dual of [216, 90, 50]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6424, 54, F64, 24) (dual of [54, 30, 25]-code or 54-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- linear OA(41, 4, F4, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4125, 215, F4, 48) (dual of [215, 90, 49]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | Linear OOA(4126, 108, F4, 2, 49) (dual of [(108, 2), 90, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
3 | Linear OOA(4126, 72, F4, 3, 49) (dual of [(72, 3), 90, 50]-NRT-code) | [i] |