Information on Result #637280
Linear OA(4141, 162, F4, 83) (dual of [162, 21, 84]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(6420, 27, F64, 20) (dual of [27, 7, 21]-code or 27-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6420, 64, F64, 20) (dual of [64, 44, 21]-code or 64-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(44,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6420, 64, F64, 20) (dual of [64, 44, 21]-code or 64-arc in PG(19,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4141, 162, F4, 82) (dual of [162, 21, 83]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(4142, 163, F4, 83) (dual of [163, 21, 84]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
3 | Linear OA(4140, 161, F4, 82) (dual of [161, 21, 83]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
4 | Linear OA(4139, 160, F4, 81) (dual of [160, 21, 82]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(4138, 159, F4, 80) (dual of [159, 21, 81]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OA(4137, 158, F4, 79) (dual of [158, 21, 80]-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OA(4136, 157, F4, 78) (dual of [157, 21, 79]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(4134, 155, F4, 76) (dual of [155, 21, 77]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OOA(4141, 81, F4, 2, 83) (dual of [(81, 2), 21, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
10 | Linear OOA(4141, 54, F4, 3, 83) (dual of [(54, 3), 21, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] |