Information on Result #637992
Linear OA(572, 92, F5, 41) (dual of [92, 20, 42]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2513, 23, F25, 13) (dual of [23, 10, 14]-code or 23-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2513, 25, F25, 13) (dual of [25, 12, 14]-code or 25-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(12,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2513, 25, F25, 13) (dual of [25, 12, 14]-code or 25-arc in PG(12,25)), using
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(572, 92, F5, 40) (dual of [92, 20, 41]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | Linear OA(571, 91, F5, 40) (dual of [91, 20, 41]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 3 | Linear OA(570, 90, F5, 39) (dual of [90, 20, 40]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(569, 89, F5, 38) (dual of [89, 20, 39]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(567, 87, F5, 36) (dual of [87, 20, 37]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(572, 46, F5, 2, 41) (dual of [(46, 2), 20, 42]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |