Information on Result #638027
Linear OA(584, 100, F5, 53) (dual of [100, 16, 54]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2517, 25, F25, 17) (dual of [25, 8, 18]-code or 25-arc in PG(16,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,25) [i]
- linear OA(52, 4, F5, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,5) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(52, 5, F5, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,5)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(584, 100, F5, 52) (dual of [100, 16, 53]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(583, 99, F5, 52) (dual of [99, 16, 53]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
3 | Linear OA(582, 98, F5, 51) (dual of [98, 16, 52]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(581, 97, F5, 50) (dual of [97, 16, 51]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(579, 95, F5, 48) (dual of [95, 16, 49]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OOA(584, 50, F5, 2, 53) (dual of [(50, 2), 16, 54]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |