Information on Result #638112
Linear OA(5114, 130, F5, 75) (dual of [130, 16, 76]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(2518, 26, F25, 18) (dual of [26, 8, 19]-code or 26-arc in PG(17,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(8,25) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+2P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+1P) with degQ = 4 and degPÂ =Â 3 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- linear OA(53, 5, F5, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,5) or 5-cap in PG(2,5)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(2,5) [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(5114, 130, F5, 74) (dual of [130, 16, 75]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(5115, 131, F5, 75) (dual of [131, 16, 76]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
3 | Linear OA(5116, 132, F5, 75) (dual of [132, 16, 76]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(5117, 133, F5, 75) (dual of [133, 16, 76]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(5113, 129, F5, 74) (dual of [129, 16, 75]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
6 | Linear OA(5112, 128, F5, 73) (dual of [128, 16, 74]-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OA(5111, 127, F5, 72) (dual of [127, 16, 73]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(5110, 126, F5, 71) (dual of [126, 16, 72]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OA(5119, 136, F5, 75) (dual of [136, 17, 76]-code) | [i] | Construction X with Varšamov Bound | |
10 | Linear OOA(5114, 65, F5, 2, 75) (dual of [(65, 2), 16, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
11 | Linear OOA(5114, 43, F5, 3, 75) (dual of [(43, 3), 15, 76]-NRT-code) | [i] |