Information on Result #638636
Linear OA(778, 84, F7, 59) (dual of [84, 6, 60]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(4911, 14, F49, 11) (dual of [14, 3, 12]-code or 14-arc in PG(10,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4911, 49, F49, 11) (dual of [49, 38, 12]-code or 49-arc in PG(10,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(38,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4911, 49, F49, 11) (dual of [49, 38, 12]-code or 49-arc in PG(10,49)), using
- linear OA(74, 6, F7, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(74, 7, F7, 4) (dual of [7, 3, 5]-code or 7-arc in PG(3,7)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.