Information on Result #640224
Linear OA(9102, 120, F9, 63) (dual of [120, 18, 64]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8131, 40, F81, 31) (dual of [40, 9, 32]-code or 40-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- linear OA(91, 3, F9, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(91, s, F9, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.