Information on Result #640700
Linear OA(9116, 130, F9, 79) (dual of [130, 14, 80]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8119, 26, F81, 19) (dual of [26, 7, 20]-code or 26-arc in PG(18,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8119, 81, F81, 19) (dual of [81, 62, 20]-code or 81-arc in PG(18,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(62,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8119, 81, F81, 19) (dual of [81, 62, 20]-code or 81-arc in PG(18,81)), using
- linear OA(93, 5, F9, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,9) or 5-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(9115, 129, F9, 78) (dual of [129, 14, 79]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(9116, 65, F9, 2, 79) (dual of [(65, 2), 14, 80]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |