Information on Result #640756
Linear OA(9106, 112, F9, 83) (dual of [112, 6, 84]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8113, 16, F81, 13) (dual of [16, 3, 14]-code or 16-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(68,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- linear OA(95, 7, F9, 5) (dual of [7, 2, 6]-code or 7-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(95, 9, F9, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(95, 9, F9, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.