Information on Result #640823
Linear OA(2200, 209, F2, 98) (dual of [209, 9, 99]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(24, 13, F2, 2) (dual of [13, 9, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 15, F2, 2) (dual of [15, 11, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(4,2) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 15, F2, 2) (dual of [15, 11, 3]-code), using
- linear OA(2187, 196, F2, 95) (dual of [196, 9, 96]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,8) [i]
- linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- Simplex code S(3,2) [i]
- linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.