Information on Result #640841
Linear OA(2148, 156, F2, 72) (dual of [156, 8, 73]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(211, 19, F2, 6) (dual of [19, 8, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(211, 23, F2, 6) (dual of [23, 12, 7]-code), using
- Golay code G(2) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(211, 23, F2, 6) (dual of [23, 12, 7]-code), using
- linear OA(2129, 137, F2, 65) (dual of [137, 8, 66]-code), using
- adding a parity check bit [i] based on linear OA(2128, 136, F2, 64) (dual of [136, 8, 65]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(20, 8, F2, 0) (dual of [8, 8, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(20, s, F2, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(2120, 128, F2, 63) (dual of [128, 8, 64]-code), using
- Reed–Muller code RM(5,7) [i]
- linear OA(20, 8, F2, 0) (dual of [8, 8, 1]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- adding a parity check bit [i] based on linear OA(2128, 136, F2, 64) (dual of [136, 8, 65]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.