Information on Result #640983
Linear OA(3137, 144, F3, 86) (dual of [144, 7, 87]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(356, 63, F3, 35) (dual of [63, 7, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(356, 64, F3, 35) (dual of [64, 8, 36]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
- linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(356, 64, F3, 35) (dual of [64, 8, 36]-code), using
- linear OA(374, 81, F3, 50) (dual of [81, 7, 51]-code), using
- an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.