Information on Result #641667
Linear OA(9120, 127, F9, 91) (dual of [127, 7, 92]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(912, 19, F9, 10) (dual of [19, 7, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
- linear OA(9101, 108, F9, 80) (dual of [108, 7, 81]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(910, 17, F9, 9) (dual of [17, 7, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- linear OA(984, 91, F9, 70) (dual of [91, 7, 71]-code), using
- linear OA(910, 17, F9, 9) (dual of [17, 7, 10]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.