MinT - Information on Result #641790

Information on Result #641790

Linear OA(9⁹⁷, 101, F₉, 84) (dual of [101, 4, 85]-code), using juxtaposition based on

linear OA(9⁶, 10, F₉, 6) (dual of [10, 4, 7]-code or 10-arc in PG(5,9)), using
- extended Reedâ€“Solomon code RS_e(4,9) [i]
linear OA(9⁸⁷, 91, F₉, 77) (dual of [91, 4, 78]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
  1. linear OA(9⁵, 9, F₉, 5) (dual of [9, 4, 6]-code or 9-arc in PG(4,9)), using
    - Reedâ€“Solomon code RS(4,9) [i]
  2. linear OA(9⁷⁸, 82, F₉, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using
    - projective code from ovoid in PG(3,Â 9) [i]

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	Linear OA(9⁹⁷, 101, F₉, 83) (dual of [101, 4, 84]-code)	[i]		Strength Reduction
2	Linear OA(9¹⁰⁷, 111, F₉, 91) (dual of [111, 4, 92]-code)	[i]		Juxtaposition