Information on Result #641796
Linear OA(9100, 104, F9, 86) (dual of [104, 4, 87]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(98, 12, F9, 7) (dual of [12, 4, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(98, 18, F9, 7) (dual of [18, 10, 8]-code), using
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(98, 18, F9, 7) (dual of [18, 10, 8]-code), using
- linear OA(988, 92, F9, 78) (dual of [92, 4, 79]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.