Information on Result #641817
Linear OA(9113, 117, F9, 97) (dual of [117, 4, 98]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(915, 19, F9, 13) (dual of [19, 4, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(915, 20, F9, 13) (dual of [20, 5, 14]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,6P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(915, 20, F9, 13) (dual of [20, 5, 14]-code), using
- linear OA(994, 98, F9, 83) (dual of [98, 4, 84]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using
- linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.