Information on Result #644612
Linear OA(968, 91, F9, 42) (dual of [91, 23, 43]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,30P) ⊂ AG(F,39P) based on
- linear OA(959, 73, F9, 42) (dual of [73, 14, 43]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,30P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- linear OA(950, 73, F9, 33) (dual of [73, 23, 34]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,39P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74 (see above)
- linear OA(99, 18, F9, 8) (dual of [18, 9, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(99, 19, F9, 8) (dual of [19, 10, 9]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(99, 19, F9, 8) (dual of [19, 10, 9]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.