Information on Result #644864
Linear OA(1649, 71, F16, 40) (dual of [71, 22, 41]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,23P) ⊂ AG(F,27P) based on
- linear OA(1646, 64, F16, 40) (dual of [64, 18, 41]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,23P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- linear OA(1642, 64, F16, 36) (dual of [64, 22, 37]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,27P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(163, 7, F16, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,16) or 7-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(163, 16, F16, 3) (dual of [16, 13, 4]-code or 16-arc in PG(2,16) or 16-cap in PG(2,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(16120, 142, F16, 81) (dual of [142, 22, 82]-code) | [i] | Repeating Each Code Word | |
| 2 | Linear OA(16114, 136, F16, 78) (dual of [136, 22, 79]-code) | [i] | Juxtaposition | |
| 3 | Linear OOA(1649, 35, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(35, 2), 21, 41]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |