Information on Result #661436
Linear OA(2218, 234, F2, 99) (dual of [234, 16, 100]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(470, 78, F4, 49) (dual of [78, 8, 50]-code), using
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(472, 80, F4, 51) (dual of [80, 8, 52]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(472, 80, F4, 51) (dual of [80, 8, 52]-code), using
- linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(2217, 233, F2, 98) (dual of [233, 16, 99]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OA(2214, 230, F2, 95) (dual of [230, 16, 96]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OA(2213, 229, F2, 94) (dual of [229, 16, 95]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(2211, 227, F2, 92) (dual of [227, 16, 93]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(2210, 226, F2, 91) (dual of [226, 16, 92]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OA(2207, 223, F2, 88) (dual of [223, 16, 89]-code) | [i] | ||