Information on Result #661652
Linear OA(9121, 128, F9, 94) (dual of [128, 7, 95]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(930, 37, F9, 23) (dual of [37, 7, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,3P) ⊂ AG(F,9P) [i] based on
- linear OA(925, 27, F9, 23) (dual of [27, 2, 24]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,3P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- linear OA(920, 27, F9, 17) (dual of [27, 7, 18]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28 (see above)
- linear OA(95, 10, F9, 5) (dual of [10, 5, 6]-code or 10-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(5,9) [i]
- construction X applied to AG(F,3P) ⊂ AG(F,9P) [i] based on
- linear OA(984, 91, F9, 70) (dual of [91, 7, 71]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.