Information on Result #661738
Linear OA(1676, 83, F16, 64) (dual of [83, 7, 65]-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OA(1610, 17, F16, 10) (dual of [17, 7, 11]-code or 17-arc in PG(9,16)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(7,16) [i]
- linear OA(1659, 66, F16, 53) (dual of [66, 7, 54]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,10P) ⊂ AG(F,12P) [i] based on
- linear OA(1658, 64, F16, 53) (dual of [64, 6, 54]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) with known gap numbers [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- linear OA(1657, 64, F16, 51) (dual of [64, 7, 52]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,12P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(161, 2, F16, 1) (dual of [2, 1, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(161, s, F16, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,10P) ⊂ AG(F,12P) [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.