Information on Result #673598
Linear OA(2170, 261, F2, 53) (dual of [261, 91, 54]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(52) ⊂ Ce(50) based on
- linear OA(2169, 256, F2, 53) (dual of [256, 87, 54]-code), using an extension Ce(52) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = [1,52], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 53 [i]
- linear OA(2165, 256, F2, 51) (dual of [256, 91, 52]-code), using an extension Ce(50) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 255 = 28−1, defining interval I = [1,50], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 51 [i]
- linear OA(21, 5, F2, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(2170, 261, F2, 52) (dual of [261, 91, 53]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(2171, 262, F2, 53) (dual of [262, 91, 54]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
3 | Linear OA(2172, 263, F2, 53) (dual of [263, 91, 54]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(2173, 264, F2, 53) (dual of [264, 91, 54]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(2169, 260, F2, 52) (dual of [260, 91, 53]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
6 | Linear OOA(2170, 130, F2, 2, 53) (dual of [(130, 2), 90, 54]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
7 | Linear OOA(2170, 87, F2, 3, 53) (dual of [(87, 3), 91, 54]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OOA(2170, 52, F2, 5, 53) (dual of [(52, 5), 90, 54]-NRT-code) | [i] |