Information on Result #674049
Linear OA(2128, 152, F2, 53) (dual of [152, 24, 54]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(54) ⊂ Ce(46) ⊂ Ce(42) based on
- linear OA(2113, 128, F2, 55) (dual of [128, 15, 56]-code), using an extension Ce(54) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 127 = 27−1, defining interval I = [1,54], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 55 [i]
- linear OA(2106, 128, F2, 47) (dual of [128, 22, 48]-code), using an extension Ce(46) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 127 = 27−1, defining interval I = [1,46], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(299, 128, F2, 43) (dual of [128, 29, 44]-code), using an extension Ce(42) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 127 = 27−1, defining interval I = [1,42], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- linear OA(29, 18, F2, 5) (dual of [18, 9, 6]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(18,2) [i]
- linear OA(24, 6, F2, 3) (dual of [6, 2, 4]-code or 6-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- Simplex code S(3,2) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(2127, 151, F2, 52) (dual of [151, 24, 53]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2128, 76, F2, 2, 53) (dual of [(76, 2), 24, 54]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |