Information on Result #674181

Linear OA(233, 78, F2, 11) (dual of [78, 45, 12]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(10) ⊂ Ce(6) based on
  1. linear OA(228, 64, F2, 11) (dual of [64, 36, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 26−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
  2. linear OA(219, 64, F2, 7) (dual of [64, 45, 8]-code), using an extension Ce(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 26−1, defining interval I = [1,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
  3. linear OA(25, 14, F2, 3) (dual of [14, 9, 4]-code or 14-cap in PG(4,2)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(233, 78, F2, 10) (dual of [78, 45, 11]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(234, 79, F2, 11) (dual of [79, 45, 12]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OA(232, 77, F2, 10) (dual of [77, 45, 11]-code) [i]Truncation
4Linear OA(2240, 589, F2, 50) (dual of [589, 349, 51]-code) [i]Construction X with Cyclic Codes
5Linear OA(2249, 589, F2, 52) (dual of [589, 340, 53]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(2258, 589, F2, 54) (dual of [589, 331, 55]-code) [i]
7Linear OOA(233, 39, F2, 2, 11) (dual of [(39, 2), 45, 12]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
8Linear OOA(233, 26, F2, 3, 11) (dual of [(26, 3), 45, 12]-NRT-code) [i]