Information on Result #677510
Linear OA(3218, 225, F3, 139) (dual of [225, 7, 140]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(159) ⊂ Ce(99) based on
- linear OA(3160, 161, F3, 160) (dual of [161, 1, 161]-code or 161-arc in PG(159,3)), using an extension Ce(159) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,159], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 160 [i]
- linear OA(3154, 161, F3, 100) (dual of [161, 7, 101]-code), using an extension Ce(99) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
- linear OA(358, 64, F3, 38) (dual of [64, 6, 39]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(913, 16, F9, 12) (dual of [16, 3, 13]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
- linear OA(913, 16, F9, 12) (dual of [16, 3, 13]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.