Information on Result #682002

Linear OA(453, 79, F4, 27) (dual of [79, 26, 28]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([0,65]), C2 = C([1,80]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([1,65]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([0,80]) based on
  1. linear OA(438, 63, F4, 22) (dual of [63, 25, 23]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4164, 189, F4, 68) (dual of [189, 25, 69]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,65], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,65}|+1 = 69 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(446, 63, F4, 26) (dual of [63, 17, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4172, 189, F4, 80) (dual of [189, 17, 81]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,80], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 81 [i]
  3. linear OA(447, 63, F4, 27) (dual of [63, 16, 28]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4173, 189, F4, 83) (dual of [189, 16, 84]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,80], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,…,80}|+1 = 84 (BCH-bound) [i]
  4. linear OA(437, 63, F4, 21) (dual of [63, 26, 22]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4163, 189, F4, 65) (dual of [189, 26, 66]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,65], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 66 [i]
  5. linear OA(40, 1, F4, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
  6. linear OA(46, 15, F4, 4) (dual of [15, 9, 5]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.