Information on Result #691238
Linear OA(946, 97, F9, 24) (dual of [97, 51, 25]-code), using construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(16) based on
- linear OA(939, 81, F9, 24) (dual of [81, 42, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(930, 81, F9, 17) (dual of [81, 51, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(97, 16, F9, 6) (dual of [16, 9, 7]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(20,9) [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(910, 20, F9, 9) (dual of [20, 10, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(97, 17, F9, 6) (dual of [17, 10, 7]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.