Information on Result #691476
Linear OA(940, 92, F9, 22) (dual of [92, 52, 23]-code), using construction XX applied to Ce(21) ⊂ Ce(16) ⊂ Ce(15) based on
- linear OA(935, 81, F9, 22) (dual of [81, 46, 23]-code), using an extension Ce(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,21], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- linear OA(930, 81, F9, 17) (dual of [81, 51, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(928, 81, F9, 16) (dual of [81, 53, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(94, 10, F9, 4) (dual of [10, 6, 5]-code or 10-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(6,9) [i]
- linear OA(90, 1, F9, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(940, 46, F9, 2, 22) (dual of [(46, 2), 52, 23]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |