Information on Result #709794

Linear OA(525, 130, F5, 10) (dual of [130, 105, 11]-code), using construction XX applied to C1 = C([123,7]), C2 = C([0,8]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,7]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([123,8]) based on
  1. linear OA(522, 124, F5, 9) (dual of [124, 102, 10]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,7}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
  2. linear OA(522, 124, F5, 9) (dual of [124, 102, 10]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
  3. linear OA(525, 124, F5, 10) (dual of [124, 99, 11]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,8}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
  4. linear OA(519, 124, F5, 8) (dual of [124, 105, 9]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 124 = 53−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
  5. linear OA(50, 3, F5, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
  6. linear OA(50, 3, F5, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(525, 65, F5, 2, 10) (dual of [(65, 2), 105, 11]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
2Linear OOA(525, 43, F5, 3, 10) (dual of [(43, 3), 104, 11]-NRT-code) [i]